What is Freedom to Operate Search?

A Freedom to Operate (FTO) or Clearance Search is conducted in the relevant jurisdictions prior to a product or service being marketed. It is utilized to evaluate the prospective likelihood of potential infringement and reduce the chance of additional legal issues. FTO search typically focus on one country, but for absolute surety, it is recommended that the search be widened to cover foreign applications that could potentially reach the target jurisdictions. During the FTO search, patent claims are examined that could be applicable to the features of the expected product or service. This process makes you comfortable enough to start your business.

Why it is important for inventors and businesses

• Protect from Legal Risks: If you launch a product that is already patented, you may be sued for patent infringement.
• Risk-Free Market Entry: FTO allows you to make risk-free investments in development, manufacturing, and marketing.
• Assurance for Investors and Partners: Prior to funding or cooperation, investors and partners frequently want FTO clearance.

Legal Foundations of FTO

What is Patent?

A patent is a governmental-granted legal right provided to an inventor that provides exclusive ownership of their invention for a specific time period (usually 20 years from the date of filing). The right permits the inventor to keep others from producing, using, or selling the invention without permission. A patent essentially protects an invention that is new, useful, and not obvious, which can be a product or a process.

Patentability vs. FTO

Patentability search is a search employed for identifying whether an invention is already disclosed to the public in any form or not. Patentability search encompasses any type of material which is in public domain available and could be termed as prior art, including patents, research papers, online publications or any other types of non-patent literatures.

Conversely, an FTO search (right-to-use or clearance search) is a search for determining if a product or invention is saleable or useable without infringing on existing patent rights.

Patentability Search:

• To find out if an invention is patentable or not.
• Novelty and non-obviousness of the invention is the focus of this search.
• Search scope is jurisdiction-specific active patents.
• Search is done prior to patent filing.
• The ultimate result of the search is to give advice on patent application.
• The search is cheaper compared to FTO searches.

FTO Search:

• Purpose is to ascertain risk of patent infringement.
• Third-party patents and claims are the emphasis of the search.
• The scope of the search is worldwide prior art(s) comprising both patents and non-patent literature.
• The search is done prior to product launch or commercialization.

• The ultimate result of the search is to deliver a possible risk assessment.

Patent Rights Differ by Jurisdiction

A patent in one jurisdiction does not give protection in others because patent rights are territorial in nature. Each jurisdiction has its own enforcement system, rules, and patent office. Hence, unless you have filed and received patents in Europe, China, India, or any other jurisdiction, your invention is not protected if you only have a patent in the US. For example, you can prevent anyone from making, utilizing, importing, or marketing your innovation anywhere within the United States if you obtain a patent within the country. According to U.S. law, you cannot prevent a person from manufacturing or selling the same invention in Germany if you do not possess a patent in that country.

Why Jurisdiction is Important for FTO?

If you are marketing a product in several countries, it is not enough to do an FTO search in one country. You must examine the patents of other nations where you intend to manufacture, sell, distribute, or provide the product. This way, you can ensure that you don't infringe someone's existing patent rights in any country and thus avoid legal proceedings, import restrictions, or postponement of your product release.

How Claims Define Infringement

Claims are the most important element of a patent application since they define the scope of protection an invention deserves. In other words, patent claims define the legal boundaries of an invention where the inventor’s exclusive rights begin and end.

Importance of FTO Analysis

An FTO search is useful for purposes other than ensuring legal compliance. It helps achieve a number of strategic business objectives:

• Reducing Legal Risks: Through FTO searches, companies can identify potentially conflicting patents early on and develop workarounds or investigate other licensing options. This minimizes the possibility of future infringement claims.
• Minimizing Litigation Expenses: Allegations of patent infringement can be expensive and time-consuming. A FTO search before product launch significantly reduces the chance of lawsuits, saving time, cost, and reputation.
• Improving Investment and Licensing Appeal: A clean FTO report can boost investor confidence and facilitate more advantageous license negotiations. It demonstrates thoroughness and reduces perceived risks associated with the product or technology.
• Safeguarding Intellectual Property Assets: By having a thorough awareness of the IP landscape, businesses can protect their portfolios and avoid litigation. By creating their designs around existing patents, businesses can also stop their own ideas from being weakened.
• Supporting long term growth: Avoiding patent disputes ensures that attention will remain on innovation, development, and market expansion without being diverted by legal concerns. An effective FTO strategy supports ongoing research and development and enhances competitive advantage.

When is the right time to conduct an FTO analysis

Conducting a Freedom to Operate ("FTO") search is fundamental to the innovation life cycle. It serves as a legal and marketing checkpoint for companies and innovators who want to make sure that their technology, method, or product may be sold without violating any existing intellectual property (IP), particularly patents.

Key Stages for Conducting an FTO analysis

The timeliness of an FTO search is critical to mitigate risk and ensure a clear path to market. A number of typical phases can provide some guidance on the decision, although the best time may vary depending on the nature of the innovation and the business goals:

• Early Stage Product Planning: When planning for the product at an early stage of the product development, companies can eliminate possible patent conflicts by conducting a freedom-to-operate search before dedicating a significant amount of time and resources to the process. Once risks are recognized, the product can be re-designed or altered to circumvent infringement.
• Pre-product Launch: In order to avoid delays and legal barriers, you must conduct FTO search before the product launch. This system reduces the risk of litigation and streamlines the commercialization process by providing companies an opportunity to identify and address other relevant patents before a matter becomes litigious.
• Before Filing a Patent Application: An FTO search is beneficial to help work out whether a proposed innovation is likely to infringe any patents that already exist before filing a patent application. The FTO asks whether or not practice could lead to legal problems, while patentability asks whether an invention is new and non-obvious. Understanding both aspects will help ensure your IP filings are more meaningful and informed.
• Transactions such as Mergers or Acquisitions: In the case of a merger or acquisition, an FTO search can illuminate any undisclosed IP risks. This data can affect the terms of the deal as well.
• When Adding New Features or Expanding into New Markets: Adding new features or improvements to an existing product, or entering new geographic markets, may put the product in conflict with other patents. In these situations, a new FTO search guarantees continued adherence to patent regulations in the updated setting.

Strategic Factors that Influence FTO Timing

Several practical and strategic factors can influence when an FTO search should be carried out:

• Product Development Stage: Conducting the search early helps avoid costly reworks or redesigns.
• Urgency to Enter the Market: A quicker FTO assessment might be required for a quicker market launch.
• Budgetary Restrictions: Although thorough FTO searches can be expensive, postponing them may result in far higher costs because of potential legal action.
• Competition Activity: Vigorous competition increases the necessity of FTO inspections to prevent infringement on pending patents.
• Impending Licensing or Acquisition Deals: Knowing the FTO risks prior to licensing or acquisitions helps guarantee that the technology is viable within the law.  

Risks of not conducting an FTO Search

Following are the repercussions of not conducting an FTO search:

• Unintentional Patent Infringement: Businesses may face cease-and-desist orders, product recalls, or injunctions for unintentional patent infringement.
• High Financial Liabilities: IP rights lawsuits can result in large settlements and litigation expenses.
• Interrupted Product Rollout: If intellectual property conflicts are discovered after a product launch, manufacturing may be stopped or redesigns may be required.
• Damage to Brand and Trust: Claims of patent infringement may have a detrimental impact on a company's reputation and clientele
• Reduced Investment Appeal: Legal concerns may discourage possible partners or investors from lending their support or working with the business.

Economic Impact of an FTO Search

Depending on the intricacy of the technology, the number of jurisdictions investigated, and the depth of the prior art study, the cost of an FTO search might vary greatly. Even if up-front fees might seem substantial, they pale in comparison to the possible costs and risks of intellectual property litigation.

Hiring an expert patent lawyer or IP firm to conduct the search can improve accuracy and guarantee expert handling of intricate legal opinions and claim interpretations.

How to Conduct an FTO Analysis

The steps involved in an FTO analysis are listed below:

Step 1: Understanding the technology and preparing key features

This step involved developing an understanding of the technical domain and preparing key features of the search. Key features are the essential technical elements, functions, or structural components that define what the product or process is and how it works. In simple words, key features are the core building blocks of the search.

Step 2: Patent Search

This step involved formulating search strategies and carrying out search on one or more of third party patent databases such as Questel Orbit, Patseer, USPTO and Espacenet and on AI-based tools. A variety of search strategies will be used to identify relevant patent references from the databases. As an example, following strategies may be used for identifying relevant patent references:

• Assignee based searching
• Keyword based searching
• Inventor based searching
• Class based searching (IPC; US class; CPC; F-Term etc.)
• Citation searching (which includes analysis of Backward and Forward citations of relevant references)
• Similarity searching

Step 3: Jurisdiction Coverage

One important consideration in FTO searches is jurisdiction. The jurisdictions in which the client indents to commercialize a product must be included in the search. In the future, losing out on a significant patent in a certain country may have major legal repercussions. For instance, if the product is intended to be commercialized in the U.S., the patent search can primarily focus on U.S. patents. However, it is advisable to also search the WIPO database, as there may be international patent applications that could later enter the U.S. jurisdiction through the PCT national phase route.

Step 4: Date Restriction

Typically, a 20-year period is considered for conducting FTO searches. Patents too have a fixed term of typically 20 years. In some cases, or jurisdictions, this period can be extended by a few additional years through regulatory mechanisms such as Patent Term Extensions (PTE). Further, an international application, or PCT application, may enter the regional or national phase within 31 months from the earliest priority date. Therefore, a date restriction of 31 months should be applied for searching PCT application.

Step 5: Preliminary Patent Screening

This step involved conducting a preliminary screening, based on title, abstract, claims of the patents obtained above to identify potentially relevant patents.

Step 6: Detailed Analysis

This step involved detailed analysis of the potentially relevant patents and their mapping in accordance with the key features of the product.

This step further involved categorization of the relevant identified patents based on claim length and their legal status.

The scope of the invention is determined by the length of the primary independent claim. Patents with shorter primary independent claims typically cover more ground. Priority is given to patents having shorter primary independent claims since they can have broader project effects.

Further, Sorting patents according to their family legal status in FTO searches can yield important information. Prioritize active and issued patents above anything else since they may present immediate obstacles during product launches.

However, patents whose legal status is expired, lapsed may also be shortlisted due to the following reasons:

• Expired patents not only show that the technology is open source, but they also provide guidance to the R&D team on how to improve or modify it. In the early phases of the product's or technology's development, this is fairly significant. Additionally, they can be utilized to invalidate a patent that you may be violating. These patents may also be used in negotiations for license. As a result, including these patents to an FTO analysis can lower the total risk and the expense of overcoming it.
• One key point to remember is that a patent that has expired for reasons other than completing its full term can still be revived at any time. Many patents that lapse due to non-payment of maintenance fees can be reinstated within a six-month grace period by simply paying the required fees. In some cases, even after that period, the patent can still be revived depending on whether the delay was considered inadvertent or inevitable. In short, an expired patent is not always truly dead, it can be revived unexpectedly, so it is wise not to ignore it completely.

Step 6: Deliverable Report:

The final deliverable is a structured MS Excel-based report. This report includes all the potential references located during the search.

Importance of Claims in an FTO Analysis

The purpose of a Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis is to make sure that your product or procedure does not fall within the range defined by another individual's patent claims.

FTO analysis involves closely reading, analyzing, and comparing assertions in existing patents with your product or technology. This process is done by comparing such statements with the characteristics of an implied technology or product to determine whether there is any potential overlap that could cause patent infringement.

 

How to handle risks identified in an FTO analysis?

Once a risk has been identified in the Freedom to Operate study, it is imperative to take preventative action. Depending on how serious the risk is, there are several strategic options.

Licensing Strategies

When there is a potential risk of patent infringement, obtaining a license is often the simplest way to achieving Freedom to Operate (FTO).

• Proactive Licensing: To negotiate licensing terms and prevent future problems, get in touch with patent holders as soon as possible, ideally prior to product launch.
• Cross-Licensing: Useful when both companies own complementary intellectual property, allowing mutual access and reducing litigation risks.
• Territory- or Field-Restricted Licenses: These personalized licenses help reduce costs by limiting use to specific regions or application areas.

Design Around Strategies

Another way to achieve FTO is to amend a product or procedure to prevent infringement on patent claims.

• Technical Evaluation: Analyze the specific elements of the patent claims and amend the product design accordingly.
• Claim Mapping: Visually map features of the product against patent claims to identify and mitigate infringement risks.
• Documentation: Maintain detailed records of design decisions and the rationale for changes made to avoid infringement.

Design around strategy lowers legal risk, leading to better products and a more powerful position in the market.

Challenging Patents (e.g., Invalidation)

When a potentially blocking patent appears weak, overly broad, or inappropriately granted, legal mechanisms are available to challenge its validity.

• Pre-Grant Opposition/Post-Grant Review: Depending on the jurisdiction, third parties can contest a patent's validity through administrative proceedings at the patent office.
• Litigation: If the patent is enforced, invalidity can sometimes be asserted as a defense during court proceedings.
• Prior Art Search: A detailed prior art search is essential to identify earlier publications or disclosures that can form the basis of a strong invalidation case.

Challenging patents unblocks the path for commercialization and also strengthen the overall IP strategy.

Keeping an eye on competitors' IP

Regularly keeping an eye on competitors’ patents helps in early risk assessment and strategy modification.

• Patent Watching Services: Monitor new applications and changes to existing patents.
• Legal Status Updates: Keep an eye on abandonments, oppositions, and expirations.
• Landscape Analysis: Identify potential white spaces and locations where competitors might concentrate.

Active monitoring helps anticipate future FTO risks and promotes well informed decision making. Businesses can securely proceed with product development and commercialization while managing FTO risks by integrating legal, technological, and strategic approaches. 

Industry-Specific Considerations for FTO Search

While performing FTO searches, it is crucial to consider the specifics of each industry. Each Industry has their own associated risks and patent processes; these factors should be considered during the comprehensive analysis.

Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical

In biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, identifying only compound patents is not sufficient while performing Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis. Other types of patents are also included during the comprehensive search. These patents include:

• Compound Patents: These patents protect the main active component.
• Method-of-Use Patents: These patents protect particular medical indications or uses.
• Formulation Patents: These patents cover the delivery of the medication, including dose forms and combinations.
• Process Patents: These patents cover aspects of producing or creating a substance.

Additionally, patent term extensions, regulatory exclusivities, and Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs), which can significantly boost market protection, should all be taken into account.

ICT and Software

FTO search in the ICT and software domain may be a critical task due to the fact that patent laws vary between jurisdictions, and software is considered as abstract subject matter by the law. Therefore, during the analysis, the following points should be considered:

• Algorithms: If an algorithm achieves a technical result, it might qualify for patent protection, particularly in areas like the US and Europe.
• Implementation Details: Patents may cover specific aspects of a system's structure, data handling, or user interface.
• Open-source Components: Any open-source code used should be examined to make sure it conforms with licensing requirements and poses no legal issues.

Electronics and Mechanical

In mechanical and electronics fields, it is important to identify both system level patnts and component level patents. Component patents also include motors, connectors, and other parts, in addition to sensors.

• System Integration: Patents related to the arrangement or operation of several components.
• Manufacturing Processes: Patents covering the assembly or manufacturing of components. 

Real-World Case Studies

Performing or not performing Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) analysis can have a substantial effect on a business's legal and financial results. Here are two opposing instances that demonstrate the importance of a strong FTO procedure.

Failure to Conduct FTO

Monsanto vs. DuPont

Background: DuPont used a Roundup Ready gene that was licensed from Monsanto to create genetically modified (GM) crops. But without the required license, DuPont also combined their own characteristic with Monsanto's proprietary gene.

Consequently, Monsanto sued DuPont for patent infringement, resulting in a $1.75 billion payment in 2012. This is one of the largest patent settlements in American history.

Teaching Point: DuPont suffered serious financial and reputational harm as a result of their inability to properly evaluate FTO and define the extent of current patent rights. The licensing loopholes might have been found and the danger could have been reduced sooner with a proper FTO investigation.

Successful FTO-Led Launch

Gilead Sciences - Sovaldi®

Background: Gilead Sciences carried out a thorough FTO and due diligence examination prior to releasing its ground-breaking hepatitis C medication Sovaldi®, particularly after purchasing Pharmasset (the original developer).

FTO Strategy: Gilead assessed patents that overlapped in terms of formulation, chemical, and method of use. It proactively resolved possible patent disputes and entered into license arrangements as needed.

Result: Sovaldi® became one of the world's best-selling medications after the business successfully marketed the medication with little risk of intellectual property lawsuit.

Teaching Point: Early IP risk assessment is strategically valuable, as evidenced by Gilead's successful product launch, safe market entry, and quick revenue generation made possible by their strong FTO strategy.

Common Misconceptions in FTO

 “I have a patent, so I automatically have FTO.”

Having a patent grants you the ability to restrict who can use your innovation, but it does not grant you unrestricted use. It's possible that your patented product nevertheless uses technology that are the subject of other pending patents. Even if you have a patent for your product, an FTO search can assist you find out if using, producing, or selling it could violate someone else's rights.

 “If the patent expired, I’m safe.”

Even if expired patents no longer grant enforceable rights, it might still be dangerous to assume you're safe based just on that. Your goods might still violate related patents that are still in effect, such as divisionals, family members, or continuations, or improvements that were patented later. Examining the entire patent family and associated filings is crucial.

 “U.S. patents are your only concern."

You can't just concentrate on U.S. patents if you intend to sell or manufacture your goods elsewhere. Ownership of patents is geographical. Even if a product is approved for the US market, it may still violate patents in other target markets, such as China, India, or Europe. A thorough FTO study needs to include all jurisdictions that are pertinent to your company plan.

The Hidden IP Risk Most Innovators Are Still Ignoring: Why FTO Must Be Continuous not a one-time process

In today’s fast-paced technologically advanced and innovation-driven environment, product owners consider Freedom to Operate (FTO) search as the only means to safeguard themselves against the potential threat of infringement. One should be mindful that even if the FTO search clears the product for lunch, there is no guarantee that all safeguard measures are in place. Special attention and continuous IP monitoring is required to avoid court room battles even after the product launch.  Therefore, the product owners should never ignore the below mentioned risks and threats. Due consideration should be given to not to ignore them and formulate the post-launch strategies accordingly.

• Pending Patent applications are silent threats: During prosecution, pending patent applications may get amended. Something that appears harmless today could pose a significant risk of infringement tomorrow, specifically targeting a product that is already available for purchase.
• Continuation Filings Keep the Door Open: Some patent holders file strategic continuations to reshape claims around what the market is doing. That implies you could be blindsided by a parent patent application that was technically filed years ago but has unclaimed embodiments to which the launched product might infringe.
• Long Product Lifecycles = Long Term Risk: Products vary from automobiles to software. But the majority of FTO assessments do not evolve accordingly. New patents may emerge as the product develops and such considerations may not be taken into account at the time of the initial clearance.
• The Hidden Risk Window: There is often a significant lag between when a patent is filed and when it becomes publicly available or granted. During this window, companies may unknowingly develop products that overlap with claims in unpublished applications. This creates a blind spot where infringement risk exists, but isn’t yet visible.

Due to the aforementioned issues, companies should consider Freedom to Operate (FTO) search as a continuous and evolving process rather than a one-time compliance activity. Below safeguarding measures can be complemented to the current plan and strategies.

• Stay Ahead of Competitors: Continuous monitoring of the evolving IP landscape enables businesses to identify new opportunities, adjust proactively to changes in patent claims, and avoid being blindsided by late-stage patents.
• Spot Risk Early: Ongoing monitoring helps companies spot potential risks early, allowing them to explore design alternatives or secure licenses, thus preventing expensive infringement lawsuits.
• R&D aligns with evolving patent activity: With continuous FTO insights, companies stay aligned to the evolving patent activities, thereby reducing the likelihood of unexpected obstacles that could threaten the sale and revenue generated from their products in market.
• Strong Market Position: Continuous FTO analysis enables companies to secure their market position and reduce the chances of infringement which can lead to disruption in their growth.
• Growth for emerging businesses: For startups and growing businesses, access to real-time FTO insights helps prevent inefficient R&D spending and support confident, well-informed go-to-market strategies.

Conclusion

A Freedom to Operate (FTO) search is a proactive, strategic search that enables businesses and inventors to navigate the complexities of the patent landscape confidently. Whether at the early stage of development or prior to market entry, an FTO search helps in identifying and addressing legal obstacles that could hinder the successful commercialization of an innovation.

Companies may protect their intellectual property, lower legal risks, gain the trust of investors, and set themselves up for long-term success in cutthroat markets by investing in a comprehensive FTO plan, ideally with the assistance of knowledgeable patent experts.

At Effectual Services, we follow a rigorous and systematic approach to FTO searches, ensuring that our clients receive a comprehensive and well-organized report that aids informed decision-making and innovation in their respective domains. Feel free to contact us at info@effectualservices.com

About Effectual Services

At Effectual, we have successfully delivered 500+ Freedom to Operate (FTO) search projects worldwide in various branches of science for gathering and analyzing the latest advancements and innovations in specific scientific fields such as biotechnology, chemistry, environmental science, computer science, medical science, material science, agricultural science, neuroscience, energy science, aeronautical engineering, mechanical engineering, and electrical engineering searches etc.

Follow Us: Linkedin, Twitter