Rule 11/337 Investigation Support

About the service

The team at Effectual Services has been supporting various US law firms in pre-filing investigations required before filing a patent infringement lawsuit, specifically Rule 11 and ITC 337 Investigations. We provide support in conducting reasonable infringement analysis prior to filing the lawsuit. The pre-filing infringement analysis is performed as a two-step process and involves both a legal and a technical part. The legal part of the analysis is claim construction. The technical part is a comparison of the alleged infringing products with the interpreted claims. We deliver claim construction charts which include both intrinsic and extrinsic evidence to support the correct interpretation.

Methodology

Following steps are performed for Rule 11/337 investigation suppor

Step 1

Understand the legal framework

Clear and detailed understanding of the legal provisions, rules, and procedures governing Section 337 investigations.

Step 2

Case evaluation and strategy development

Assessing the case to determine if it meets the criteria for a Section 337 investigation. Analyzing the alleged unfair practices or violations and formulate a comprehensive legal strategy.

Step 3

Initial case assessment

Conducting a thorough assessment to evaluate the potential merits and strength of the case, examining the alleged infringement.

Step 4

Two step-analysis

The pre-filing infringement analysis is performed as a two-step process and involves both a legal and a technical part. The legal part of the analysis is claim construction. The technical part is a comparison of the alleged infringing products with the interpreted claims.

Step 5

Claim construction charts

Delivering claim construction charts which include both intrinsic and extrinsic evidence to support the correct interpretation. The infringement charts include mapping of the claimed elements with the product features.

Why Choose us?

Why choose Effectual Services for Rule 11/337 investigation support

We have a team of experienced workforce, consisting of Engineers, Bachelors, Masters and PhDs from various technical backgrounds, including Computer Science and Information Technology, Electronics and Communications, Electrical, Mechanical, Chemical, Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences domain.

Many of our team members have a Law degree in addition to the technical degrees making them ideal for Intellectual Property related services like Rule 11/337 investigation support.

We provide support in conducting reasonable infringement analysis prior to filing the lawsuit.

We provide customized pricing plans in accordance with the budget and the requirements.

Effectual Services has performed around 1700+ projects related to Rule 11/337 investigation in a year.
Call to Action

Case Study

One of our clients (XYZ company), who is a leading innovator in the field of autonomous vehicles, faced a significant challenge when they were accused of patent infringement related to their autonomous driving systems. The client approached us to provide comprehensive Rule 11/337 investigation support. The primary objective was to mount a robust defense against the patent infringement allegations and assert the non-infringement of XYZ company's autonomous driving systems. We conducted a thorough investigation, gathered evidence, and builded a compelling case to support the client's position. We understood the technical intricacies of XYZ company's autonomous driving systems and the specifics of the patent infringement claims. Our team of expert patent attorneys and technical analysts performed a detailed analysis of the asserted patents and the accused products. We diligently prepared claim charts, analyzed prior art, and collaborated closely with the client to develop a strong defense strategy. We were appreciated by the client over the call.

Once a US law firm approached us for a Rule 11/337 investigation support project. We supported the US law firm in pre-filing investigations required before filing a patent infringement lawsuit, specifically Rule 11 and ITC 337 Investigations. We provided support in conducting reasonable infringement analysis prior to filing the lawsuit, and also provided claim charts which included detailed and clear evidences to support the correct interpretation. The charts included mapping of the claimed elements with the product features. We were appreciated by the client.

A US based client once approached us for a Rule 11/337 investigation support project. The primary objective was to respond to the allegations of patent infringement effectively. We collaborated closely with the client to understand the technology involved, analyze the complaint's merits, etc. Our expert team navigated the complex legal and procedural landscape of a Rule 11/337 investigation, ensuring compliance and presenting a compelling case. Through detailed evidence collection, strategic analysis, and skilled legal representation, we effectively defended against the allegations of patent infringement. We played a pivotal role in successfully defending the client during the Rule 11/337 investigation. The client appreciated us.

FAQ

A Rule 11/337 investigation, also known as a Section 337 investigation, is conducted by the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) to determine whether certain unfair practices in import trade, such as patent infringement or trademark infringement, have occurred.

Rule 11/337 investigations are governed by Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which provides the legal basis for addressing unfair competition and unfair practices related to imported products, including issues related to intellectual property.

Rule 11/337 investigations address various unfair practices, including patent infringement, trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, false advertising, and other forms of unfair competition in the importation of goods into the United States.

A Rule 11/337 investigation can be initiated by any interested party, including individuals, companies, or organizations, that believe they are being harmed by unfair practices related to imports.

Yes, parties can appeal the USITC's determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit within a specified timeframe. The appeals process allows for a review of the USITC's decision.
US, UK, IN
Get in Touch