Patent Searches And Management Cover A Wide Range Of Services

About the service

A patentability search or novelty search is conducted to evaluate the patentability of an invention based on the statutory requirements of a patent office. The searches are conducted prior to preparing the patent application to determine whether the invention is novel and non-obvious. The objective of the search is to identify prior art relevant to the novelty of the invention in patent and non-patent literature. Conducting a patentability search early in the innovation process can save you a significant amount of time and money. By identifying prior art and potential patent obstacles early on, you can reduce the risk of infringing on existing patents. This can help you avoid costly legal disputes and potential damages.

An accelerated examination search (AES) requires comprehensive prior art search of US patents, published patents, and non-patent literature. It requires an applicant to submit a pre-examination report along with the patent application in order to receive the examiner’s final decision within 1 to 12 months, depending on the specific rules and timelines established by the patent office offering the Accelerated Examination program.

Chemical structure searches involve finding a specific spatial arrangement of molecules in the patent or non-patent document. Our team of pharmaceutical experts and chemical engineers assist you in determining the novelty and validity of a claim in a chemical structure by conducting searches in subscribed patent databases. We perform in-depth analysis of the structures to identify similar compounds. Depending on the type of structure and database, structure searching is supplemented by other strategies such as IUPAC/Common name search, CAS number search to overcome the inherent limitations of the database and ensure the best quality results for the specific chemical compound or structure being sought. These additional search strategies, such as IUPAC/Common name search and CAS number search, serve as valuable complementary approaches, enhancing the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the search results, ultimately ensuring the best possible quality of information retrieved from the database.

Methodology

Knock out search methodology

Following steps are performed for Knockout Searches

Step 1

Understanding of the Invention

The first step in conducting knockout searches is to have a clear understanding of the invention. This involves a thorough grasp of the technical details, unique features, and potential applications of the invention.

Step 2

Preparing Key Features from Invention

Identifying and documenting the key features and aspects of the invention.

Step 3

Relevant Keyword Identification

Identifying relevant keywords is crucial for conducting efficient patent searches. Listing keywords and phrases that describe the invention, including synonyms and related terms.

Step 4

Relevant Patent Class Identification

Patent classification systems categorize inventions into specific classes and subclasses based on their technology and application. This step ensures that the search is focused on the most pertinent areas.

Step 5

Using Patent Databases for Patent Search

Utilizing patent databases to access a vast repository of patent documents. We use databases like Orbit, Patseer, Derwent Innovation, Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, WIPO, etc. for patent searches.

Step 6

Preparing an Efficient Search Strategy

Combining the identified keywords and patent classes to create an efficient search strategy. In addition to this, we consider the following advanced search techniques: Citation Search, Similarity Search, Assignee and Inventor Search.

Step 7

Performing Open Search Using Search Engines for NPL (Non-Patent Literature) and PL (Patent Literature)

In addition to patent databases, we consider performing open searches using search engines for both non-patent literature (NPL) and patent literature (PL) related to the invention.

Step 8

Finding Relevant Art

Once we retrieves a list of patents that match our search criteria, we analyze them to identify relevant prior art. This involves a careful review of the patent documents, including their titles, abstracts, and detailed descriptions.

Step 9

Preparing Report

Once we have performed the exhaustive searching, we prepare a final report for sharing with the client, including the most relevant identified results, our search strategies, mapping of the results, etc.

Patentability Search Methodology

Following steps are performed for Patentability Searches

Step 1

Understanding of the Invention

The first step in conducting knockout searches is to have a clear understanding of the invention. This involves a thorough grasp of the technical details, unique features, and potential applications of the invention.

Step 2

Preparing Key Features from Invention

Identifying and documenting the key features and aspects of the invention.

Step 3

Relevant Keyword Identification

Identifying relevant keywords is crucial for conducting efficient patent searches. Listing keywords and phrases that describe the invention, including synonyms and related terms.

Step 4

Relevant Patent Class Identification

Patent classification systems categorize inventions into specific classes and subclasses based on their technology and application. This step ensures that the search is focused on the most pertinent areas.

Step 5

Using Patent Databases for Patent Search

Utilizing patent databases to access a vast repository of patent documents. We use databases like Orbit, Patseer, Derwent Innovation, Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, WIPO, etc. for patent searches.

Step 6

Preparing an Efficient Search Strategy

Combining the identified keywords and patent classes to craft an efficient search strategy. In addition to this, we consider the following advanced search techniques: Citation Search, Similarity Search, Assignee and Inventor Search.

Step 7

Narrowing Search Strategy If Results Are Too High

In cases where our initial searches generate an overwhelming number of results, we refine our search strategy. We achieve this by adding specific keywords, selecting more precise patent classifications, or tightening our search filters.

Step 8

Finding Relevant Art

Once we retrieves a list of patents that match our search criteria, we analyze them to identify relevant prior art. This involves a careful review of the patent documents, including their titles, abstracts, and detailed descriptions.

Step 9

Preparing Report

Once we have performed the exhaustive searching, we prepare a final report for sharing with the client, including the most relevant identified results, our search strategies, mapping of the results, etc.

Accelerated Examination search methodology

Following steps are performed for Accelerated Examination Searches

Step 1

Understanding the Requirements

We understand the specific requirements and criteria set by the patent office offering the AES program.

Step 2

Preliminary Search

We perform an initial search to identify prior art related to the invention. This initial search serves as the foundation for our comprehensive search.

Step 3

Developing a Search Strategy

Creating a well-structured search strategy that encompasses keywords, Boolean operators, and search parameters.

Step 4

Using Patent Databases

Utilizing patent databases made available by the relevant patent office and other pertinent sources for our search.

Step 5

Conducting a Comprehensive Search

Performing a thorough search across a variety of databases and sources to locate relevant patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature.

Step 6

Analyzing Found References

Carefully scrutinizing each located reference and comparing it to the invention. Highlighting both differences and similarities and preparing explanations demonstrating the novelty and non-obviousness of your invention.

Step 7

Preparing the Pre-Examination Search Report

Organizing our search findings, analyses, and explanations into a structured pre-examination search report adhering to the patent office's guidelines.

Design search methodology

Following steps are performed for Design Searches

Step 1

Understanding the Design

We begin by thoroughly understanding the design that need to be patented. This includes its aesthetic aspects, ornamental features, and any functional elements that may affect the overall appearance.

Step 2

Identifying Key Features

Identifying the key features and distinctive elements of the design. Noting down specific details that set the design apart from existing designs.

Step 3

Relevant Keyword Identification

Creating a list of relevant keywords and phrases that describe the design, including synonyms, technical terms, and variations that may be used to describe similar innovations.

Step 4

Relevant Locarno Class Identification

We narrow down our search scope by identifying relevant Locarno classes or classifications. Locarno classes are used for performing design searches.

Step 5

Utilizing Design Patent Databases

We have access to the design patent databases provided by the relevant patent office or commercial patent search providers, e.g., Orbit design search, EUIPO design search, WIPO design searches, Google Patents, etc.

Step 6

Visual Comparison

We carefully examine the visual representations of the found design patents and compare each patent to the subject design's visual representations to identify similarities or differences.

Step 7

Preparing Report

Once we have performed the exhaustive searching, we prepare a final report for sharing with the client, including the most relevant identified results, our search strategies, analysis comments, etc.

Invalidity Methodology

Following steps are performed for Invalidity Searches

Step 1

Understanding the Subject Patent

The first step is clearly understanding the target patent to be validated/invalidated, including its claims, scope, description, figures, etc.

Step 2

File Wrapper Analysis

Reviewing the target patent's file wrapper or prosecution history to gain insights into the examiner's considerations, amendments, and rejections, etc.

Step 3

Relevant Keyword Identification

Identifying relevant keywords for conducting efficient patent searches. We begin by listing keywords and phrases that describe the patent claims, including synonyms and related terms.

Step 4

Relevant Patent Class Identification

To narrow down our search and target the right patents, we identify relevant patent classes or classifications. Patent classification systems categorize inventions into specific classes and subclasses based on their technology and application.

Step 5

Date Criteria

In the context of an invalidity search, we limit our search to patent and non-patent references that have publication dates preceding the priority or publication date of the subject patent.

Step 6

Using Patent Databases for Patent Search

We utilize various patent databases to access a vast repository of patent documents. We use databases like Orbit, Patseer, Derwent Innovation, Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, WIPO, etc. for patent searches.

Step 7

Preparing an Efficient Search Strategy

Combining the identified keywords and patent classes to create an efficient search strategy. In addition, we consider the following advanced search techniques Citation Search, Similarity Search, Assignee & Inventor Search and Sematic Searches, etc.

Step 8

Performing Open Search Using Search Engines for NPL (Non-Patent Literature) and PL (Patent Literature)

In addition to patent databases, we consider performing open searches using search engines for both non-patent literature (NPL) and patent literature (PL) related to the subject patent.

Step 9

Claim Mapping

Mapping the claims of the target patent to the references and prior art found during the search. Clearly mentioning areas where the claims overlap or differ from the prior art.

Step 10

Report Preparation

Lastly, compiling the search results, including relevant patents, file wrapper information, analysis of references. We present findings in a comprehensive report, including visual aids such as charts, graphs, and claim charts, if necessary.

Freedom to Operate search Methodology

Following steps are performed for Freedom to Operate Searches

Step 1

Understanding the Technology/Product

The first step is clearly understanding the technology or product. This involves a thorough grasp of the technical details, unique features, and potential applications of the technology/product.

Step 2

Preparing Key Features

Identifying the key features and key aspects of the product/technology.

Step 3

Define the Scope & Identifying Relevant Jurisdictions

Clearly defining the scope of the FTO search, specifying the product, process, or technology to be assessed.

Step 4

Conducting Keyword and Classification Searches

Performing keyword searches, patent classification searches, citation, similarity, assignee and inventor, etc. to find relevant patent references.

Step 5

Reviewing Granted Patents

Examining granted patents that are relevant to the product/technology. We closely pay attention to the claims and descriptions.

Step 6

Analyzing Pending Applications

Checking for pending patent applications that may become granted patents in the future, as they can pose a risk if they align with the product/technology.

Step 7

Evaluating Patent Claims

Carefully analyzing the patent claims of relevant patents to assess their scope and determine if they cover aspects of the product/technology.

Step 8

Examining Expiration Dates

We note the expiration dates of the relevant patents, as the product/technology may have more freedom to operate once these patents expire.

Step 9

Documenting the FTO Analysis

Lastly, preparing a comprehensive report summarizing the results of the FTO search, including any identified risks, potential infringement issues, and recommended actions, etc.

Asian language Search Methodology

Following steps are performed for Asian Language Searches

Step 1

Defining Search Scope

Clearly defining the scope and objectives of the search. Determining the specific technology, industry, or field of innovation to be explored within Asian language patents.

Step 2

Identifying Relevant Keywords

Compiling a list of relevant keywords and phrases that describe the technology or invention.

Step 3

Translating Keywords

Translating the English keywords into the Asian language(s) relevant to our search (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Korean).

Step 4

Choosing Patent Databases

Identifying patent databases that include Asian language patents. Some databases, like the Japan Patent Office (JPO) for Japanese patents or the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) for Chinese patents, etc. are specific to certain countries.

Step 5

Exploring Asian Patent websites

Visiting the websites of Asian patent offices, such as the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), Japan Patent Office (JPO), or Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). These websites often provide patent databases and search tools in their respective languages.

Step 6

Using Asian Language Search Tools

Using the Asian language search tools and interfaces provided by the chosen Asian patent databases. Some databases offer search interfaces in both Asian and English languages.

Step 7

Input Translated Keywords

Entering the translated Asian language keywords into the search interfaces.

Step 8

Reviewing Search Results

Review the search results to identify patents and documents related to the subject technology or invention. We closely pay attention to titles, abstracts, and relevant sections of the documents.

Step 9

Document and Report

Documenting our search process, including the databases used, search terms, and results obtained. We create a report summarizing our findings and insights, to share with the client.

Landscape searches methodology

Following steps are performed for Landscape Searches

Step 1

Understanding the Disclosure/Technology

Defining the scope of the patent landscape search, including understanding the specific technology, the objectives of the analysis, etc.

Step 2

Identify Keywords and Classifications

Identifying relevant keywords, phrases, and search terms related to the technology of interest. Also, determining appropriate patent classifications (e.g., International Patent Classification, Cooperative Patent Classification) to categorize patents accurately.

Step 3

Formulating Search Queries

Creating search queries and questions using the keywords and categories identified.

Step 4

Searching Patent Databases

Utilizing various patent databases e.g., Orbit, Patseer, Derwent Innovation, Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, EPO, etc. to conduct searches using the identified keywords and classifications.

Step 5

Data Collection

Collecting information about the relevant patents.

Step 6

Data Analysis

Analyzing all this information to see if there are any interesting patterns or trends.

Step 7

Report Preparation

Finally, we create a map or report that shows our findings. This report helps to understand the world of inventions in that specific area.

State of the art search methodology

Following steps are performed for State of the art Searches

Step 1

Understanding of the Invention

The first step in conducting knockout searches is to have a clear understanding of the invention. This involves a thorough grasp of the technical details, unique features, and potential applications of the invention.

Step 2

Preparing Key Features from Invention

Identifying and documenting the key features and aspects of the invention.

Step 3

Relevant Keyword Identification

Identifying relevant keywords is crucial for conducting efficient patent searches. We list keywords and phrases that describe the invention, including synonyms and related terms.

Step 4

Relevant Patent Class Identification

Patent classification systems categorize inventions into specific classes and subclasses based on their technology and application. This step ensures that the search is focused on the most pertinent areas.

Step 5

Using Patent Databases for Patent Search

Utilizing patent databases to access a vast repository of patent documents. We use databases like Orbit, Patseer, Derwent Innovation, Google Patents, Espacenet, USPTO, WIPO, etc. for patent searches.

Step 6

Preparing an Efficient Search Strategy

Combining the identified keywords and patent classes to craft an efficient search strategy. In addition to this, we consider the following advanced search techniques: Citation Search, Similarity Search, Assignee and Inventor Search.

Step 7

Narrowing Search Strategy If Results Are Too High

In cases where our initial search generates an overwhelming number of results, we refine our search strategy. We achieve this by adding specific keywords, selecting more precise patent classifications, or tightening our search filters.

Step 7

Finding Relevant Art

Once we retrieve a list of patents that match our search criteria, we analyze them thoroughly to identify relevant art. This involves a careful review of the patent documents, including their titles, abstracts, and detailed descriptions, etc.

Step 7

Preparing Report

Once we have performed the exhaustive searching, we prepare a final report for sharing with the client, including the most relevant identified results, our search strategies, analysis comments, etc.

Bio-Sequence Search Methodology

The methodology of bio-sequence search involves broadly scoping, understanding, searching, analysis, and reporting

Scope of the Project

The search is conducted for the granted patents and published patent applications filed worldwide.

The Bio-sequence search is conducted in three phases, following a structured approach

Methodology The project is executed in 3 phases. Effectual Services proposes the following methodology to be adopted for the project
Step 1

Understanding the technology

We develop an understanding of the objective and scope of the project, and the technology domain.

Step 2

Key word based Searching

We perform a comprehensive search on patent databases (pertinent to the technical domain), using a variety of strategies such as –

  • Keyword based searching

  • Class based searching for example, IPC/USC/CPC;

  • Assignee/Inventor based searching,

  • Citation searching (citations of the patent to oppose or one of its family member)

  • A similarity search (using tools available from e.g. ORBIT) etc.

  • On the patents side, we use one or more of the following patent databases: Orbit (from Questel), Totalpatent (from Lexis Nexis, covers ~100 jurisdictions worldwide), Patseer, Derwent Innovation (covers ~100 jurisdictions worldwide), Google patent, and Espacenet.

Step 3

Sequence based Searching

  • Option 1 : We perform sequence based search only on the free public databases - NCBI BLAST, Patent Lens to locate references which disclose the sequence of interest.

  • Option 2 : We perform sequence based search on the database – REGISTRY using STN as database host to locate references which disclose the sequence of interest. We also perform sequence search on free public databases - NCBI BLAST, Patent Lens.

Step 4

Analysis and reporting

A detailed analysis of the identified results (from Step 3 above) is performed in order to locate the key references. We will analyze references disclosing sequence(s) with a specific ‘% Identity’ and ‘% Query Coverage’ to capture the references covering the above listed objective of the study.

Deliverable Format  MS Excel based deliverable including the Granted patents and published patent applications and comprising following broad sections :
1. Project Overview/Methodology   This section will cover the details of the project and the Methodology adopted by the Analyst(s) during the course of the project along with the Assumptions (if any).
2. Relevant references   This section will include references located during the search along with their relevant text. Sequence mapping information (SEQ ID Number(s), Sequence alignment details, % Identity, % Query Coverage) will be included along with bibliographic information of identified patent references.
3. Search Log   This section will include the Search strings used to identify the relevant dataset.

Chemical Structure Search Methodology

The methodology of chemical structure search involves broadly scoping, understanding, searching, analysis, and reporting.

Scope of the Project

The search is conducted for the granted patents and published patent applications and non-patent literature published worldwide.

The Chemical structure search is conducted in three phases, following a structured approach

Step 1

Understanding the Technology

In this initial phase, we immerse ourselves in the domain of interest, gaining a deep understanding of the structure features provided by the Client

Step 2

Searching

We perform a comprehensive search on patent and non-patent databases

  • Our search strategies encompass

  • (A) Keyword based Searching

  • We perform a comprehensive search on patent databases using

  • Keyword-based searching;

  • Class-based searching for example, IPC/USC/CPC;

  • Citation searching;

  • Assignee/Inventor-based searching etc.

  • We perform a comprehensive search on non-patent databases using

  • Keyword based searching

  • Afflation/Author based searching

  • For non-patent literature searches cover pertinent databases such as ScienceDirect, PubChem, Pubmed, CiteseerX, Google, Google Scholar, etc. to retrieve relevant prior art.

  • (B) Structure-based Searching

  • Strategy 1 : Structure search on publicly available databases such as PubChem (includes patent), SureChEMBL, Patent Scope and ChemSpider.

  • Strategy 2 : Structure search on publicly available databases + CASLINK database cluster (includes MARPAT, CAPLUS, & REGISTRY) using STN as database host to locate patent references that disclose the structure of interest.

Step 3

Analysis and Reporting

A detailed analysis of the identified results (from Step 2 above) is performed in order to locate the key references. We also provide relevant excerpts/claims for the identified references in the search report.

Deliverable Format  MS Excel-based deliverable including the Granted patents and published patent applications and comprising the following broad sections :
1. Project Overview/Methodology   This section covers the details of the project and the Methodology adopted by the Analyst(s) during the course of the project along with the Assumptions (if any).
2. Relevant references   This section includes the Granted patents and Published patent applications related to the technology along with their relevant claims/text and structure(s). This section includes the key features found in the identified patents and Published patent applications (feature matrix).
3. Search Log   This section include the Search strings used to identify the relevant dataset.

Why Choose us?

At Effectual Services, we understand that patent searches are a critical step in protecting your intellectual property and making informed decisions. Here's why you should choose us for your patent search

Expertise

Our team consists of experienced patent researchers and professionals who are well-versed in the intricacies of patent law and the nuances of patent searches. We have a proven track record of delivering accurate and comprehensive results.

Tailored Solutions

We offer personalized patent search services tailored to your specific needs. Whether you require a validity/invalidity search, a patentability search, or a specialized search like a chemical structure search, we can customize our approach to meet your objectives.

Comprehensive Databases

We have access to extensive patent databases and cutting-edge search tools, ensuring that we can efficiently and effectively search for relevant patents and prior art.

Accuracy and Thoroughness

Our commitment to precision means that we leave no stone unturned in our searches. We meticulously analyze patent documents, ensuring that you receive the most relevant and up-to-date information.

Confidentiality

Your intellectual property is of utmost importance to us. We maintain strict confidentiality throughout the search process, safeguarding your ideas and innovations.

Cost-Effective

Our services are competitively priced, and we offer transparent pricing structures. You can trust that you'll receive exceptional value for your investment.

A high-tech team does the following searches every year
2000+ Knock Out Search/ Patentability Search   |   1500+ Freedom To Operate Search   |   600+ Invalidity/Validity searches   |   1000+ Accelarated Examination Search   |   1000+ Design   |   1000+ Freedom to operator (FTO)   |   400+ Asian Language Search   |   100+ Patent Landscape Search   |   500+ State Of The Art Search
Call to Action

Case Study

Once a client, who is a multinational electronics company, approached us to conduct patentability search. The company was poised to launch a groundbreaking wearable technology device. To ensure its patentability, they asked us to conduct a thorough patentability search. The identified relevant prior art by us, allowed the company to make crucial design modifications before filing for a patent. This proactive approach not only strengthened their patent application but also helped avoid potential infringement risks in the ever-evolving wearables market.

Once a client, who is a pharmaceutical startup, approached us to coduct an FTO search. They developed a promising drug formulation for a specific medical condition. Prior to initiating clinical trials and commercialization, they asked us to perform an FTO search. We conducted the search, the search revealed existing patents that could potentially be infringed upon. With this insight, the company negotiated licensing agreements with patent holders, ensuring they could proceed with their research and development without legal hindrances. We were appreciated by the client.

Once in a patent litigation scenario, a technology company faced allegations of patent infringement. They approached us to perform an invalidity search to challenge the validity of the plaintiff's asserted patent. We conducted a thorough search, our search uncovered prior art that questioned the novelty and non-obviousness of the patent, leading to a favorable outcome in the litigation. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive invalidity searches in defending against patent infringement claims. The client was quite impressed by our results.

FAQ

Conducting a patent search helps assess the patent landscape, evaluate novelty, identify competitors, and make informed decisions about patent protection.

Costs vary based on the type, complexity, and service provider. Basic searches are more affordable, while comprehensive or specialized searches can be costlier.

The time required depends on complexity, prior art volume, and the searcher's expertise. Basic searches are quicker, while extensive searches take longer.

Prior art includes all publicly available information (patents, publications, etc.) relevant to an invention, used to determine its novelty and non-obviousness.

It's not mandatory but highly recommended to evaluate patentability and potential risks.

It's typically done before filing a patent application to gauge the invention's patentability.

They are typically conducted during patent litigation or to challenge a competitor's patent.

Specialized databases allow us to input molecular formulas or structural diagrams to retrieve relevant patents.

No, it's applicable to various industries, including chemistry, materials science, and agriculture.

It's essential in biotechnology, genomics, and pharmaceutical industries for patent-related research.

It's done before product launch to minimize the risk of patent infringement.

It reduces the time to patent grant, offering a competitive edge.

They are crucial for businesses operating in Asian markets with extensive patent activity.

While similar, a landscape search is more focused on trends and market opportunities.

It's done when seeking to protect the unique visual appearance of a product.

Advanced techniques involve using Boolean operators, patent classifications, and expert databases for more precise searches.

Yes, professionals use various tools like Derwent Innovation, Orbit, PatBase, etc. for in-depth searches.
US, UK, IN
Get in Touch