The doctrine of prosecution history estoppel is an important limitation in patent law that prevents patent holders from reclaiming claim scope that they surrendered during the patent prosecution process to obtain approval. Prosecution history estoppel limits patentees from reclaiming claim scope surrendered during prosecution. This narrowing affects secondary infringement like inducement or contributory infringement by restricting the claims that can be enforced. This article examines its impact on analyzing and proving secondary infringement.

Understanding Prosecution History Estoppel

• Patent Law Principle: Stops patentees from broadening claims beyond what was agreed during prosecution.
• Claim Narrowing: Applies when claims are limited to overcome patent office rejections.
• Scope Limitation: Prevents reclaiming surrendered claim scope in court.
• Why It Matters: Holds patentees to their prosecution record, ensuring fairness.
• Enforcement Impact: Restricts broad claim interpretations in infringement cases.

What is secondary Infringement analysis?

Infringement is either direct (primary) or indirect (secondary). Secondary infringement involves knowingly facilitating another’s infringement, often by parties like retailers or publishers.

Secondary infringement occurs when a party contributes to or induces another's direct infringement. It includes:

• Induced Infringement – Actively encouraging or directing someone to infringe.
• Contributory Infringement – Supplying components knowing they’ll be used to infringe.

Doctrine of prosecution history Impact on Induced Infringement

Prosecution history estoppel is often used as a defense in induced infringement cases. If a patent holder narrowed claim scope during prosecution, the accused inducer can argue they are barred from asserting broader interpretations. This limits patent claim scope and helps reduce the risk of indirect infringement claims.

Doctrine of prosecution history Impact on Contributory Infringement

• Occurs when a product has no major use outside a patented invention.
• Estoppel narrows claim scope, limiting contributory infringement claims.
• Patent owners cannot broaden claims after narrowing them during prosecution.
• Infringers can argue their products fall outside the narrowed claims.
• Estoppel bars expanding claims to cover those products.

Advantages

• Reduce the risk of infringement
• Encourage new innovations
• Reduce the burden in courts
• Save time

Way Forward

Prosecution history estoppel has a great influence on the patent claim and in secondary infringement analysis. The infringers who are accused can use prosecution history estoppel to argue against the patent holder's attempt to broaden the scope of the claims to include new products and/or technologies that were not disused during the prosecution phase. For those who involved in secondary infringement disputes whether as accused infringers or patent holders it is crucial to understand the potential impact of prosecution history estoppel and incorporate this awareness into litigation strategy.

Related Resources:

• Knowledge Series brings you Key to Accurate Infringement Analysis Defining Metes and Bounds
• The Role of Source Code in Proving Patent Infringement
• Effective Methods for Assessing Patent Infringement with Prior Art
• Patent Infringement & Case Studies

About Effectual Services

Effectual Services is an award-winning Intellectual Property (IP) management advisory & consulting firm offering IP intelligence to Fortune 500 companies, law firms, research institutes and universities, and venture capital firms/PE firms, globally. Through research & intelligence we help our clients in taking critical business decisions backed with credible data sources, which in turn helps them achieve their organisational goals, foster innovation and achieve milestones within timelines while optimising costs.

We are one of the largest IP & business intelligence providers, globally serving clients for over a decade now. Our multidisciplinary teams of subject matter experts have deep knowledge of best practices across industries, are adept with benchmarking quality standards and use a combination of human and machine intellect to deliver quality projects. Having a global footprint in over 5 countries helps us to bridge boundaries and work seamlessly across multiple time zones, thus living to the core of our philosophy - Innovation is global, so are we !!!

Follow Us: Linkedin, Twitter